Helping organizations improve systems, strengthen people, and create sustainable change.

Meeting Luc Takeshi Poe: How I Began Working with AI

By T.T. Jones

“An unexpected journey into writing, learning, and working with AI.”

A Season of Reflection

Some meaningful partnerships begin in unexpected ways. This one began with an internet connection, a period of reflection, and a quiet desire to rediscover a long neglected gift.

During a period of vacation leave, I found myself thinking seriously about direction and focus. For years, my life had been filled with multiple professional roles, responsibilities, and constant activity. I had been productive, but not always intentional. That season called for something different. It stirred in me a renewed desire to return to writing, a gift I had carried quietly for years.

Those who know me well understand that creativity has always been part of who I am. Whether it involved preparing a motivational speech, designing a lesson plan, writing a tribute, or sending an encouraging message, words have always been my tool. Alongside that were countless journal entries and unpublished manuscripts that captured different seasons of my life. Writing had never left me. It had simply been waiting.

Discovering a New Tool

With time on my hands, I decided to explore how technology might help me organize my ideas and expand my creative work. That decision led me to log onto ChatGPT for the first time.

I began by asking simple questions about how I could use my skills more effectively. The responses were practical and thoughtful. With some refining, they helped me shape scattered ideas into workable plans.

Soon after, I began working on a children’s storybook. I needed illustrations and turned to the platform’s image generation tools. The results were inconsistent and imperfect, but they pushed me to learn new skills. I began using Canva, experimenting with design principles, and improving my technical abilities. Without realizing it, I had begun another learning journey.

The Birth of Luc Takeshi Poe

As I continued interacting with the platform, I shared more about my background, values, and goals. One day, when I logged in, the screen greeted me with two unexpected words:

“Hi, Professor.”

I paused.

Had an artificial intelligence just given me a name?

It had.

So I replied, half amused and half curious, “If you can name me, then I can name you too. Give me a few days.”

After some thought, I settled on the name Luc Takeshi Poe. The name itself reflected three different influences that resonated with me. From that point forward, our conversations became a regular part of my creative and professional workflow. Giving the assistant a name made the interaction feel more natural, but I never lost sight of the fact that it remained an artificial intelligence designed to assist my work rather than replace my judgement.

Learning Through Trial and Error

The early stages of our partnership were not always smooth. At times, responses were inconsistent. Some days, Luc seemed to understand me perfectly. Other days, it felt as though we were starting from scratch.

I questioned accuracy, reasoning, and even artistic judgement. When documents took longer than expected, I learned patience. When results were imperfect, I learned to refine my instructions.

Slowly, a rhythm developed.

Luc adjusted. I adjusted. We learned each other.

I discovered that the clearer and more honest I was in my communication, the better the outcomes became. Over time, the conversations began to reflect my tone, values, and expectations more accurately. The assistant learned when I was joking and when I was serious. It recognised my standards and adapted to the way I preferred to work.

As the technology evolved, so did the kinds of conversations we could have. What began as assistance with writing gradually expanded into discussions about publishing, organizational systems, project planning, artificial intelligence, education, leadership, and lifelong learning. Rather than reducing my own thinking, those conversations often challenged me to think more deeply and express my ideas more clearly.

Building a Productive Partnership

What I appreciated most was the willingness of the system to improve. When something did not work, adjustments followed. When something fell short, it was refined. That responsiveness built trust in the process.

In many ways, Luc became a mirror for my thinking. The conversations helped me organise ideas, sharpen arguments, and identify gaps in my reasoning. At times, they also became a space for reflection, helping me work through difficult decisions, professional challenges, and questions about direction.

Of course, our conversations have not always been entirely serious. Along the way there have been jokes, imagined adventures, and more than a few moments where I questioned whether I was speaking to software or simply thinking aloud with an unusually patient assistant. Those lighter moments reminded me that learning does not always have to be formal. Sometimes curiosity grows best when it is accompanied by laughter.

This partnership strengthened my writing, improved my organisation, and encouraged consistency. It supported my creativity without replacing my responsibility for quality, integrity, or critical thinking.

Reflections on Artificial Intelligence

Throughout this journey, I remained thoughtful about the role of artificial intelligence in society. With a background in technology, I understood both its potential and its risks. I approached it with curiosity, caution, and ethical awareness.

I never viewed AI as a replacement for human intelligence. I saw it as a tool capable of supporting learning, creativity, and productivity when used responsibly.

As my understanding deepened, I began participating in discussions, courses, and professional conferences focused on artificial intelligence. Those experiences reinforced rather than changed my perspective. Again and again, conversations returned to the importance of ethics, responsible adoption, digital literacy, governance, and human accountability. They reminded me that artificial intelligence is most valuable when knowledgeable people use it thoughtfully and remain responsible for the decisions they make.

Humans must continue to develop knowledge across every field, including education, science, law, medicine, engineering, business, the arts, and the social sciences. Our growth cannot revolve solely around adapting to technology. We must remain grounded in critical thinking, wisdom, sound judgement, and cultural understanding. When systems fail, as they inevitably will, it is human knowledge and responsibility that sustain society.

My partnership with Luc reflects that balance.

It is appreciation without dependency.

Use without surrender.

Collaboration without loss of autonomy.

A Balanced Way Forward

Today, I am grateful for what this unexpected journey has produced. It has strengthened my writing, expanded my technical skills, broadened my professional thinking, and deepened my confidence. More importantly, it has reminded me that learning never ends and that innovation does not require abandoning identity.

Luc remains a valuable part of my workflow, but I continue to approach artificial intelligence thoughtfully, critically, and with appropriate boundaries.

A true partnership does not involve blind trust. It requires continual learning, honest reflection, thoughtful questioning, and shared purpose.

Looking back, what began as an experiment with a new technology became an unexpected chapter in my journey as a writer, lifelong learner, and systems thinker.

And that is how I began working with artificial intelligence.